How’s this for a mind-blowing statistic: I just read in the Economist (so it must be a conservative
conspiracy, right?) that ”Americans who finish high school, work full-time and
wait until they are 21 and married before they have children have only a 2%
chance of being poor.” Holy shit, right? That can’t possibly be true. Two percent?! I mean seriously, if you
care about solving poverty, this statistic should blow you away.
Especially because,
as the Economist points out, all
three are relatively simple criteria. Right? I mean, none of them requires your
parents to be wealthy. None requires you to be of a certain gender, or race, or
to be born in a nice neighborhood. Anyone can finish High School. It may be
hard to get the job you want, but getting a full-time job of any kind isn’t
impossible. Ok, I know, the economy sucks. Especially for us young people. But
unless you insist on only taking the jobs that you want, that advance the
career you want, getting a full-time job isn’t that hard. And anyone can wait until they are 21 and married before
having kids.
If you do all three of those relatively simple things, you
are almost guaranteed not to be poor. Which means that nearly all of America’s poor do not satisfy
these three criteria. I was absolutely floored when I read that. Because these
three statistics point out the root causes of poverty in America. They have to,
don’t they?
Let’s look at these three stats again a little more
carefully. The first is a failure of education. There is absolutely no excuse
for kids to be failing High School. Short of having a serious brain disability
such as downs syndrome, every single American teenager is fully capable of
succeeding in High School academically. Let’s be honest – High School in the US
is not exactly demanding. Just ask the
South Koreans – compared to their schools, US High Schools are a walk in the
park.
Yet many are not graduating. In fact, only 57% of Black
students in the class of 2008 graduated (I mention Blacks in particular because
the Economist article bemoaned how
Blacks in America are falling farther behind, and thus provided additional
statistics on Blacks. Also, this week is the 50th anniversary of
Martin Luther King Jr’s speech). That is an atrocious
statistic. So about half of Blacks are already out of the running to make it in
the 98% not poor category.
The second statistic indicates a dual failure of education
and the economy. The job market, especially for young people, is still really
tough. The economy is out of recession, but it doesn’t really feel like it, the
way the unemployment rate has stayed high – and that disguises millions of
Americans who have given up on looking for a job or are on permanent “disability”
because the jobs they qualify for no longer exist in America. Additionally, we’re
not educating our young people to have the skills to compete in a rapidly
changing labor market.
As painful as it is for many to hear this, the third and
final statistic is, pure and simple, a failure of old fashioned values and the
family. Simply put, if you don’t have a baby before 21 and you get married, you
qualify for the magic group of Americans that aren’t poor. Other statistics
support this assertion: the Economist also
reports that “fewer than 30% of children in the poorest third of white America
live with both parents by the time their mother turns 40. Among the most
affluent fifth, around 90% of children live in a household with both parents.
Marriage has become a fault-line dividing American classes.”
When you consider that today 72% of Black children are born
out of wedlock, you’re looking at nearly three-quarters of Blacks are already
out of the running for candidacy in the “golden group”.
The importance of marriage and family are heightened further
when you consider that the single most important statistical indicator of a
child’s academic success is the level of education of the child’s mother –
indicating that parental involvement, instilling the need for academic
excellence and following up actively on a child’s progress, is extremely
important. So the first issue – a failure of education – is really a family
issue in disguise.
The gist of all this is:
1.
1. We have identified three issues that are
near-perfect predictors of non-poverty – and therefore provide powerful insight
into poverty
2.
2. Of those three issues, two are directly linked
to marriage and family. If you consider that Black unemployment is only 14.4%
(14.4% of Blacks fail to qualify for the “golden group” by virtue of category
2), compared with 43% who fail to graduate High School and 72% that fail to
wait till 21 and get married before having kids, these two marriage-related
factors are the most important of the three.
Now, let me be clear on one thing: I hate it as much as
anyone else when right-wing conservatives preach “family values” from their
high horses; especially when what they really mean is “homosexuals are
destroying America.” But there is simply no denying the facts: the family is
the strongest guarantee against poverty. Strong families are – by far – the most
potent antidote to poverty in America.
The problem is that I’m not sure that the federal government
can do much in terms of policy to promote strong families. But that’s clearly
where the secret to conquering poverty lies.
Your post is lacking in sound logical reasoning on so many levels. To so quickly dismiss these factors as having nothing to with race, gender and neighborhood, indirectly or directly, when it would be trivial to show that race, gender, and the right neighborhood are probably intricately linked with these three statistics, and then to so quickly jump onto family values as being an essential component of a lack of poverty, when it would equally trivial to pick apart the "21 and married" statistic (maybe not having babies before 21 is the main important factor, and marriage is largely inconsequential). I really think your opinion and analysis lacks a bunch of sound reasoning. Perhaps I'll post a more detailed follow-up shortly, but, if you intent was to provoke reactions with extreme and weakly founded analysis, then, good sir, you have done exactly that.
ReplyDeletehttp://www.latimes.com/science/sciencenow/la-sci-sn-immigrant-violence-antisocial-behavior-20131203,0,2109312.story#axzz2mRnbZMK9
ReplyDelete